Home
Volume 1 Issue 1
Cover
Story:
2001 MORO HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT:
More of the Same
by Erwin Francis Gaerlan
The Many Facets of Conflict
Resolution
by Sophia Dimalog
The MORO HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER: A Reflection
by Erwin M. Gaerlan
The Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights
A Human Rights Framework For the Moro Struggle
by Cris M.Gaerlan, Jr.
Signs of Peace
by Sahara (Samira Gutoc)
Musings
by Faith Joan C. Mesa
News Bits
IMAN binuo ng mga estudyante
Moro Civilians Abducted by Military
- Jamal Matanog
Poetry
Economics of War |
(Continued)
The MORO HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER: A Reflection
by Erwin Gaerlan
A Reflection
Since its inception, service and
commitment has always been the guiding spirit of the MHRC staff. These
principles buoyed and kept MHRC afloat amidst incessant problems it
has faced and one-way or the other, surpassed.
The specter of financial
difficulty is foremost in the organizational problems confronted by
MHRC since its establishment. Although MHRC was able to get few small
funding grants from Funding Agencies but all these are short termed
and activity-based supports. However this situation did not dampen the
spirit of the staff. To be able to survive, MHRC made do with local
solicitations and donations on various activities it has launched.
Survival budgeting has always been the order of the day for the
institution since it begun.
MHRC was able to maintain itself
as an institution, implement its programs and run its operations
amidst grave financial problems. Besides the fact of being way far
behind the standards of existing bigger NGO’s in terms of financial
capability, the MHRC staff maintained strength and took pride in their
work. This has become a mark of distinction of the MHRC from other
NGO’s.
Admittedly, however, this
financial dilemma contributed greatly to the impediment of MHRC’s
institutional development. Because of financial constraints, staff
turnover occurs disrupting the continuity of leadership and personnel
of the institution. Thus, even the convening of the BOD becomes a
problem and volunteer staffs are hired to fill in personnel gaps. This
situation inadvertently led to the neglect for the institutional
development of MHRC.
In another plane, the MHRC like other NGO’s is not free from
influences and reins of partisan bloc politics. This reality has
plagued the NGO community for quite sometime and MHRC is not without a
share of it. However, in the case of MHRC this reality is both a
blessing and a debacle, depending upon how one looks at it and in what
perspective and framework.
The political orientation and direction of the MHRC and the continuous
supply of volunteer personnel can widely be attributed to the support
given by a political bloc who undeniably has been instrumental for the
institution’s creation. This can be accounted for as a blessing for
somehow this support helped maintain the sustainability of both the
work and manpower of the institution.
On the other hand, superimposing roles played by these political blocs
can also be detrimental to the growth and development of independent
dynamism not only of MHRC but also with any other institution. This
role becomes a source of conflict and nuances in terms of stake
holding, mandate and juridical identity. The political bloc’s over
assertion of roles played beyond institutional mandate and
organizational parameters blurs the legal character of the
institution, stunts creativity and independent initiatives and creates
an imagined yet distorted institutional growth. The MHRC experienced
this before and until now this is still a prevalent practice albeit
inconspicuously.
But then again, beyond the problems and dilemmas MHRC has faced, both
in the organizational and political plane, the success of MHRC can be
attributed mainly to the commitment and dedication of its staff to
serve the Moro people, a resolve drawn from the struggle of the Moro
people for self-determination.
Next: Quo Vadis, MHRC?
|